This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Questionnaires and Research Instruments for Cancer Patients (17) Methods in Cancer Research (31) Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools (511) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (847)

Published on in Vol 7, No 3 (2021): Jul-Sep

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30730, first published .
Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey

Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey

Strategies for the Identification and Prevention of Survey Fraud: Data Analysis of a Web-Based Survey

Authors of this article:

Mandi Pratt-Chapman1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jenna Moses2 Author Orcid Image ;   Hannah Arem3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (33) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Arevalo M, Brownstein N, Whiting J, Meade C, Gwede C, Vadaparampil S, Tillery K, Islam J, Giuliano A, Christy S. Strategies and Lessons Learned During Cleaning of Data From Research Panel Participants: Cross-sectional Web-Based Health Behavior Survey Study. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(6):e35797 View
  2. VanLone J, Pansé-Barone C, Long K. Teacher preparation and the COVID-19 disruption: Understanding the impact and implications for novice teachers. International Journal of Educational Research Open 2022;3:100120 View
  3. Daniore P, Nittas V, von Wyl V. Enrollment and Retention of Participants in Remote Digital Health Studies: Scoping Review and Framework Proposal. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(9):e39910 View
  4. Pekarsky C, Skiffington J, Leijser L, Slater D, Metcalfe A. Social Media Recruitment Strategies to Recruit Pregnant Women Into a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study: Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(12):e40298 View
  5. Hoeflich C, Wang A, Otufowora A, Cottler L, Striley C. Virtual recruitment and participant engagement for substance use research during a pandemic. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2022;35(4):252 View
  6. Duffy E, Vest D, Davis C, Hall M, De Marco M, Ng S, Taillie L. “I Think That’s the Most Beneficial Change That WIC Has Made in a Really Long Time”: Perceptions and Awareness of an Increase in the WIC Cash Value Benefit. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(14):8671 View
  7. Arem H, Moses J, Cisneros C, Blondeau B, Nekhlyudov L, Killackey M, Pratt-Chapman M. Cancer Provider and Survivor Experiences With Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JCO Oncology Practice 2022;18(4):e452 View
  8. Morishita J, Kato R, Yasuda M, Suda S. Male intimate partner violence (IPV) victims in Japan: Associations of types of harm, sociodemographic characteristics, and depression trait. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports 2023;2(3) View
  9. Agans J, Schade S, Hanna S, Chiang S, Shirzad K, Bai S. The inaccuracy of data from online surveys: A cautionary analysis. Quality & Quantity 2024;58(3):2065 View
  10. Walker L, Murry N, Longoria K. Improving Data Integrity and Quality From Online Health Surveys of Women With Infant Children. Nursing Research 2023;72(5):386 View
  11. Lerma K, Nagle A, Strelitz-Block E, Sierra G, White K. Perceptions of Abortion Legality and Availability in Mississippi Before the Fall of Roe. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2024;21(2):632 View
  12. Johnson M, Adams V, Byrne J. Addressing fraudulent responses in online surveys: Insights from a web‐based participatory mapping study. People and Nature 2024;6(1):147 View
  13. Ejem D, Wechsler S, Gallups S, Khalidi S, Coffee-Dunning J, Montgomery A, Stevens C, Keene K, Rocque G, Chamberlin M, Hegel M, Azuero A, Pisu M, Ellis D, Ingram S, Lawhon V, Gilbert T, Morrissette K, Morency J, Thorp K, Codini M, Newman R, Echols J, Cloyd D, dos Anjos S, Muse C, Goedeken S, Laws K, Herbert J, Bakitas M, Lyons K. Enhancing Efficiency and Reach Using Facebook to Recruit Breast Cancer Survivors for a Telephone-Based Supportive Care Randomized Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JCO Oncology Practice 2023;19(11):1020 View
  14. Hertz D, Tofthagen C, Rossi E, Bernasconi D, Lim J, Carlson M, Sheffield K, Nekhlyudov L, Grech L, Von Ah D, Mayo S, Ruddy K, Chan A, Alberti P, Lustberg M, Tanay M. Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy. Supportive Care in Cancer 2024;32(1) View
  15. Bakou A, Hardy L, Shuai R, Wright K, Hogarth L. Ultra-Brief Breath Counting (Mindfulness) Training Abolishes Negative Affect–Induced Alcohol Motivation in Hazardous Community Drinkers. Mindfulness 2024;15(3):653 View
  16. Wright M, Matheson J, Watson T, Sproule B, Le Foll B, Brands B. Participant Fraud in Virtual Qualitative Substance Use Research: Recommendations and Considerations for Detection and Prevention Based on a Case Study. Substance Use & Misuse 2024;59(8):1261 View
  17. Soto Díaz C, Taillie L, Higgins I, Richter A, Davis C, De Marco M, Hall M, Ng S, Duffy E. A Qualitative Exploration of Spanish-Speaking Latina Women’s Experiences Participating in WIC Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 2024;124(7):851 View
  18. Chang A, Huang S, Benjamin D, Schmidt J, Palmer C, Garrison N. Exploring the role of digital tools in rare disease management: An interview‐based study. Journal of Genetic Counseling 2024 View
  19. Wilson E, Ratcliff R, Smith R, Wilson A. The FAIR Framework of threats to data quality. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2024:1 View
  20. Zemore S, Delk J, Mericle A, Martinez P, Timko C. The use of online methods to recruit and follow a hard‐to‐reach population in the Peer Alternatives for Addiction Study 2021 Cohort. Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research 2024;48(9):1795 View
  21. Nagle A, Lerma K, Sierra G, White K. Barriers to Preferred Contraception Use in Mississippi. Journal of Women's Health 2024 View
  22. Thompson A, Utz R. Online surveys: lessons learned in detecting and protecting against insincerity and bots. Quality & Quantity 2024 View
  23. Lei F. Online recruitment for an online survey study: Our experience of dealing with fraudsters. Applied Nursing Research 2024;80:151854 View
  24. Romm K, Vogel E, Dyar C, Drabble L, Cavazos-Rehg P, Berg C. Minority stress mediates associations of sexual minority state policies and tobacco use among US sexual minority young adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2024;265:112477 View
  25. Hardesty J, Crespi E, Sinamo J, Nian Q, Breland A, Eissenberg T, Kennedy R, Cohen J. From Doubt to Confidence—Overcoming Fraudulent Submissions by Bots and Other Takers of a Web-Based Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e60184 View
  26. Ruby E, Ramlawi S, Bowie A, Boyd S, Dingwall-Harvey A, Rennicks White R, El-Chaâr D, Walker M. Identifying Fraudulent Responses in a Study Exploring Delivery Options for Pregnancies Impacted by Gestational Diabetes: Lessons Learned from a Web-Based Survey (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024 View
  27. Hanson K, Marshall G, Graham M, Villarreal D, Volpe L, Seguin-Fowler R. Identifying and Removing Fraudulent Attempts to Enroll in a Human Health Improvement Intervention Trial in Rural Communities. Methods and Protocols 2024;7(6):93 View
  28. Pinzón N, Koundinya V, Galt R, Dowling W, Baukloh M, Taku-Forchu N, Schohr T, Roche L, Ikendi S, Cooper M, Parker L, Pathak T. AI-powered fraud and the erosion of online survey integrity: an analysis of 31 fraud detection strategies. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 2024;9 View
  29. Majic S, Ditmore M. Re-thinking vulnerability: Research fraud and bureaucratic harm in community-engaged online research. Qualitative Research 2024 View
  30. Hitches E, Dudley D, Johnstone M, Woodcock S. Bots and baddies: supporting the integrity of online survey research in the face of a growing challenge. Quality & Quantity 2024 View