This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Questionnaire Mode and Participation Rates in Cancer Research (9) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (847) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (589) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Research (35) Questionnaires and Research Instruments for Cancer Patients (17) Recruitment of Research Participants (305)

Published on in Vol 1, No 2 (2015): Jul-Dec

Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Ellen Kilsdonk1 Author Orcid Image ;   Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder2 Author Orcid Image ;   Helena J van der Pal3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nynke Hollema4 Author Orcid Image ;   Leontien C Kremer5 Author Orcid Image ;   Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink6 Author Orcid Image ;   Flora E van Leeuwen7 Author Orcid Image ;   Monique W Jaspers1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marleen H van den Berg2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (12) Metrics

Journals

  1. Smith L, McNamara P, King A. Optimizing follow-up and study retention in the 21st century: Advances from the front line in alcohol and tobacco research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2017;175:171 View
  2. Hagström J, Ander M, Cernvall M, Ljótsson B, Wiman H, von Essen L, Woodford J. Heeding the psychological concerns of young cancer survivors: a single-arm feasibility trial of CBT and a cognitive behavioral conceptualization of distress. PeerJ 2020;8:e8714 View
  3. Welbie M, Wittink H, Westerman M, Topper I, Snoei J, Devillé W. Using Plain Language and Adding Communication Technology to an Existing Health-Related Questionnaire to Help Generate Accurate Information: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(4):e140 View
  4. Millar M, Elena J, Gallicchio L, Edwards S, Carter M, Herget K, Sweeney C. The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019;19(1) View
  5. Woodford J, Månberg J, Cajander Å, Enebrink P, Harila-Saari A, Hagström J, Karlsson M, Placid Solimena H, von Essen L. Help-seeking behaviour and attitudes towards internet-administered psychological support among adolescent and young adults previously treated for cancer during childhood: protocol for a survey and embedded qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open 2021;11(4):e041350 View
  6. Kim H, Kim H, Kang S, Koh K, Im H, Park Y. Comorbidity Differences by Trajectory Groups as a Reference for Identifying Patients at Risk for Late Mortality in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Longitudinal National Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 2023;9:e41203 View
  7. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Woolf B, Perkins C. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023;2023(11) View
  8. Spoor J, Vrancken Peeters M, Oldenburg H, Bleiker E, van Leeuwen F. Strategies to increase survey participation: A randomized controlled study in a population of breast cancer survivors. Annals of Epidemiology 2024;94:1 View
  9. Signorelli C, Wakefield C, Johnston K, Fardell J, Brierley M, Thornton-Benko E, Foreman T, Webber K, Wallace W, Cohn R. ‘Re-engage’ pilot study protocol: a nurse-led eHealth intervention to re-engage, educate and empower childhood cancer survivors. BMJ Open 2018;8(4):e022269 View