This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Patient Education for Cancer (227) Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (531) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (708) Cancer Self-Management (91) Natural Language Processing (917) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (654)

Published on in Vol 11 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/63677, first published .
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT’s Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT’s Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT’s Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4

Authors of this article:

Ana Grilo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Catarina Marques2 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Corte-Real2 Author Orcid Image ;   Elisabete Carolino1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marco Caetano2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Temizsoy Korkmaz F, Ok F, Karip B, Keleş P. Exploring body donation communication with large language models: Accuracy, readability, and ethical considerations. Anatomical Sciences Education 2025;18(11):1238 View
  2. Grover A, Kherodawala B, Uppal N, Jagadish A, Rani K, Ravi L. A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing AI-Generated Educational Content on Pneumonia for Medical Professionals With UpToDate. Cureus 2025 View
  3. Kaya A, Kücükdag H, Keyif B. Evaluation of the feasibility of artificial intelligence models as patient information advisors for human papillomavirus vaccines. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira 2025;71(11) View