This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (457) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (752) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1603) Breast Cancer (238) Participatory Medicine & E-Patients (825)

Published on in Vol 8, No 4 (2022): Oct-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/38088, first published .
Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design

Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design

Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design

Authors of this article:

Jet Wies Ankersmid1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sabine Siesling1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Luc J A Strobbe4 Author Orcid Image ;   Johanna M Meulepas5 Author Orcid Image ;   Yvonne E A van Riet6 Author Orcid Image ;   Noel Engels2, 7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Janine C M Prick2, 9 Author Orcid Image ;   Regina The10 Author Orcid Image ;   Asako Takahashi10 Author Orcid Image ;   Mirjam Velting11 Author Orcid Image ;   Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Constance H C Drossaert12 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (6) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Beltran-Bless A, Alshamsan B, Alzahrani M, Hilton J, Baines K, Samuel V, Pond G, Vandermeer L, Clemons M, Larocque G. Regularly scheduled physical examinations and the detection of breast cancer recurrences. The Breast 2023;69:274 View
  2. Ankersmid J, Engelhardt E, Lansink Rotgerink F, The R, Strobbe L, Drossaert C, Siesling S, van Uden-Kraan C. Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach. Cancers 2024;16(7):1390 View
  3. van Maaren M, van Hoeve J, Korevaar J, van Hezewijk M, Siemerink E, Zeillemaker A, Klaassen-Dekker A, van Uden D, Volders J, Drossaert C, Siesling S, van Maaren M, Retel V, Knottnerus B, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Guerrero-Paez C, Burgers J, Peeters M, Honkoop A, Veltman J, Mann R, Wiegersma J, Claassen S, van der Lee M, van Uden-Kraan C, Korevaar J, van Korevaar M, Siemerink E, Zeillemaker A, Klaassen-Dekker A, Drossaert C, Siesling S. The effectiveness of personalised surveillance and aftercare in breast cancer follow-up: a systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer 2024;32(5) View
  4. Vromans R, van Goor L, Pauws S. Investigating the psychological impact of communicating epistemic uncertainty in personalized and generic risk estimates: an experimental study. Journal of Risk Research 2024;27(12):1461 View
  5. Ankersmid J, Drossaert C, Strobbe L, Hackert M, Engels N, Prick J, Teerenstra S, van Riet Y, The R, van Uden-Kraan C, Siesling S. Shared decision-making supported by outcome information regarding surveillance after curative treatment for breast cancer: Results of the SHOUT-BC study. European Journal of Cancer 2024;213:115107 View
  6. Fusiak J, Sarpari K, Ma I, Mansmann U, Hoffmann V. Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2025;25(1) View