This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Nutrition, Physical Activity, Healthy Lifestyle for Cancer Patients and Survivors (131) Innovations and Technology for Physical Activity Education (695) Fitness Trackers and Smart Pedometers/Accelerometers (539) Cancer Survivorship (249) Wearable Devices and Sensors (812) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2729) Use and User Demographics of mHealth (311) Demographics of Users, Social & Digital Divide (678)

Published on in Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/24828, first published .
Associations Among Wearable Activity Tracker Use, Exercise Motivation, and Physical Activity in a Cohort of Cancer Survivors: Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

Associations Among Wearable Activity Tracker Use, Exercise Motivation, and Physical Activity in a Cohort of Cancer Survivors: Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

Associations Among Wearable Activity Tracker Use, Exercise Motivation, and Physical Activity in a Cohort of Cancer Survivors: Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

Authors of this article:

Steven De La Torre1 Author Orcid Image ;   Donna Spruijt-Metz1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Albert J Farias1, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Kong S, Lee J, Kang D, Kim N, Shim Y, Park W, Choi D, Cho J. Comparing the Effectiveness of a Wearable Activity Tracker in Addition to Counseling and Counseling Only to Reinforce Leisure-Time Physical Activity among Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancers 2021;13(11):2692 View
  2. Ginossar T, Rishel Brakey H, Sussman A, Price B, Kano M, Davis S, Blair C. “You’re Going to Have to Think a Little Bit Different” Barriers and Facilitators to Using mHealth to Increase Physical Activity among Older, Rural Cancer Survivors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(17):8929 View
  3. De La Torre S, Spruijt-Metz D, Farias A. Survivors’ health competence mediates the association between wearable activity tracker use and self-rated health: HINTS analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 2022;16(6):1268 View
  4. Onyekwere A, Okobi O, Ifiora F, Akinboro M, Akueme N, Iroro J, Dan-Eleberi A, Onyeaka F, Ghansah A. Association Between Wearable Device Use and Levels of Physical Activity Among Older Adults in the US: Evidence From the 2019-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. Cureus 2023 View
  5. Valle C, Diamond M, Heiling H, Deal A, Hales D, Nezami B, LaRose J, Rini C, Pinto B, Tate D. Physical activity maintenance among young adult cancer survivors in an mHealth intervention: Twelve‐month outcomes from the IMPACT randomized controlled trial. Cancer Medicine 2023;12(15):16502 View
  6. De La Torre S, Pickering T, Spruijt-Metz D, Farias A. The frequency of using wearable activity trackers is associated with minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity among cancer survivors: Analysis of HINTS data. Cancer Epidemiology 2024;88:102491 View
  7. Angelillo C, Tock W, Salaciak M, Reid R, Andersen R, Maheu C, Johnson N, Vall-llosera Camps M. A single-armed proof-of-concept study of Lymfit: A personalized, virtual exercise intervention to improve health outcomes in lymphoma survivors in the pandemic. PLOS ONE 2024;19(1):e0275038 View
  8. Pappot H, Steen-Olsen E, Holländer-Mieritz C. Experiences with Wearable Sensors in Oncology during Treatment: Lessons Learned from Feasibility Research Projects in Denmark. Diagnostics 2024;14(4):405 View
  9. Haider S, Hashmi H, Maryam S. Drivers of wearable fitness technology adoption for health care: an investigation through organismic integration and regulatory focus theory. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 2024 View