This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Questionnaires and Research Instruments for Cancer Patients (15) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (476)

Published on in Vol 3, No 1 (2017): Jan-Jun

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Josephine Norquist 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Diana Chirovsky 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Teja Munshi 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Chloe Tolley 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Charlotte Panter 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Gater 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (7) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Josephine Norquist   1 * ;   Diana Chirovsky   2 * , MS, PhD ;   Teja Munshi   2 * , BDS, MPH ;   Chloe Tolley   3 , BSc ;   Charlotte Panter   3 * , BSc ;   Adam Gater   3 * , BSc

1 Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, NJ, United States

2 Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, United States

3 Adelphi Values Ltd, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author: