This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Questionnaires and Research Instruments for Cancer Patients (14) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (411)

Published on in Vol 3 , No 1 (2017) :Jan-Jun

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Assessing the Comparability of Paper and Electronic Versions of the EORTC QOL Module for Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

Authors of this article:

Josephine Norquist 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Diana Chirovsky 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Teja Munshi 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Chloe Tolley 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Charlotte Panter 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Adam Gater 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (5) Tweetations (4) Metrics
Josephine Norquist 1 * ;   Diana Chirovsky 2 * , MS, PhD ;   Teja Munshi 2 * , BDS, MPH ;   Chloe Tolley 3 , BSc ;   Charlotte Panter 3 * , BSc ;   Adam Gater 3 * , BSc

1 Merck & Co., Inc. , North Wales , NJ , US

2 Merck & Co., Inc. , Kenilworth , NJ , US

3 Adelphi Values Ltd , Patient-Centered Outcomes , Bollington, Cheshire , GB

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author: