This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (147) Vaccination and Immunization in the Digital Age (374) Doctor-Patient Communication on Cancer, Prevention, and Screening (42)

Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/12307, first published .
A Thematic Analysis of Attitudes Toward Changes to Cervical Screening in Australia

A Thematic Analysis of Attitudes Toward Changes to Cervical Screening in Australia

A Thematic Analysis of Attitudes Toward Changes to Cervical Screening in Australia

Authors of this article:

Rachael H Dodd1 Author Orcid Image ;   Helena M Obermair1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kirsten J McCaffery1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (19) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nagendiram A, Bidgood R, Banks J, Heal C. Knowledge and perspectives of the new National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative interview study of North Queensland women—‘I could be that one percent’. BMJ Open 2020;10(3):e034483 View
  2. Dodd R, Obermair H, McCaffery K. Implementing changes to cervical screening: A qualitative study with health professionals. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020;60(5):776 View
  3. Dodd R, Nickel B, Wortley S, Bonner C, Hersch J, McCaffery K. Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia. BMJ Open 2019;9(10):e029319 View
  4. Obermair H, McCaffery K, Dodd R. “A Pap smear saved my life”: Personal experiences of cervical abnormalities shape attitudes to cervical screening renewal. Journal of Medical Screening 2020;27(4):223 View
  5. Dodd R, Mac O, Brotherton J, Cvejic E, McCaffery K. Levels of anxiety and distress following receipt of positive screening tests in Australia’s HPV-based cervical screening programme: a cross-sectional survey. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020;96(3):166 View
  6. Mac O, Thayre A, Tan S, Dodd R. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(6):e16701 View
  7. Dodd R, Mac O, McCaffery K. Women’s experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020;10(7):e039041 View
  8. Obermair H, Bennett K, Brotherton J, Smith M, McCaffery K, Dodd R. Australian National Cervical Screening Program renewal: Attitudes and experiences of general practitioners, and obstetricians and gynaecologists. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2021;61(3):416 View
  9. Jegathees S, Mac O, Dodd R. No longer recommended for cervical screening: How women aged 18–24 feel about the renewed National Cervical Screening Program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2021;61(4):576 View
  10. Kola‐Palmer S, Rogers M, Halliday A, Rickford R. “A lot can happen in five years”: Women's attitudes to extending cervical screening intervals. European Journal of Cancer Care 2022;31(6) View
  11. Tatar O, Haward B, Zhu P, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, McBride E, Lofters A, Smith L, Mayrand M, Daley E, Brotherton J, Zimet G, Rosberger Z. Understanding the Challenges of HPV-Based Cervical Screening: Development and Validation of HPV Testing and Self-Sampling Attitudes and Beliefs Scales. Current Oncology 2023;30(1):1206 View
  12. Taylor L, Hutchinson A, Law K, Shah V, Usher‐Smith J, Dennison R. Acceptability of risk stratification within population‐based cancer screening from the perspective of the general public: A mixed‐methods systematic review. Health Expectations 2023;26(3):989 View
  13. Zhu P, Tatar O, Haward B, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, Smith L, Brotherton J, Ogilvie G, Rosberger Z. Assessing Canadian women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: A brief report. Frontiers in Public Health 2022;10 View
  14. Nemec M, Waller J, Barnes J, Marlow L. Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: an interview study with women in England. BMJ Open 2022;12(5):e058635 View
  15. Alam Z, Deol H, Dean J, Janda M. Reasons behind Low Cervical Screening Uptake among South Asian Immigrant Women: A Qualitative Exploration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(3):1527 View
  16. Dennison R, Usher-Smith J, John S. The ethics of risk-stratified cancer screening. European Journal of Cancer 2023;187:1 View
  17. Gosbell E, Panambalana A, Stephenson A, Vici C, Dutton T, Bailey J. Awareness and attitudes towards the revised National Cervical Screening Program amongst women in rural New South Wales: a cross-sectional study. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2023;29(5):471 View
  18. Tatar O, Haward B, Perez S, Zhu P, Brotherton J, Decker K, Lofters A, Mayrand M, McBride E, Ogilvie G, Shapiro G, Smith L, Steben M, Waller J, Zimet G, Rosberger Z. On the path toward cervical cancer elimination in Canada: a national survey of factors influencing women's intentions to participate in human papillomavirus test-based primary cervical screening. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas 2024;39:100901 View
  19. Jennett C, Smith M, Machalek D, Sultana F, Prang K, McDermott T, Nightingale C, Zammit C, Pagotto A, Rankin N, Wrede C, Brotherton J. How Does Transitioning to Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening Impact Colposcopy Services? Lessons From an Australian National Program. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2024 View