This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (147) Electronic/Mobile Data Capture, Internet-based Survey & Research Methodology (832) Electronic Health Records (1053) Doctor-Patient Communication on Cancer, Prevention, and Screening (42) Secondary Use of Clinical Data for Research and Surveillance (366)

Published on in Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10529, first published .
Association Between Adherence to Cancer Screening and Knowledge of Screening Guidelines: Feasibility Study Linking Self-Reported Survey Data With Medical Records

Association Between Adherence to Cancer Screening and Knowledge of Screening Guidelines: Feasibility Study Linking Self-Reported Survey Data With Medical Records

Association Between Adherence to Cancer Screening and Knowledge of Screening Guidelines: Feasibility Study Linking Self-Reported Survey Data With Medical Records

Authors of this article:

Aisha K Lofters1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Deanna Telner3, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Sumeet Kalia3, 7 Author Orcid Image ;   Morgan Slater3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Agarwal P, Kithulegoda N, Bouck Z, Bosiak B, Birnbaum I, Reddeman L, Steiner L, Altman L, Mawson R, Propp R, Thornton J, Ivers N. Feasibility of an Electronic Health Tool to Promote Physical Activity in Primary Care: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020;22(2):e15424 View
  2. Savas L, Atkinson J, Figueroa-Solis E, Valdes A, Morales P, Castle P, Fernández M. A lay health worker intervention to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas in El Paso, Texas: A randomized control trial. Preventive Medicine 2021;145:106446 View
  3. Wintemute K, Noor M, Bhatt A, Bloch G, Arackal S, Kalia S, Aliarzadeh B, La Tona S, Lo J, Pinto A, Greiver M. Implementation of targeted screening for poverty in a large primary care team in Toronto, Canada: a feasibility study. BMC Family Practice 2021;22(1) View
  4. Lee S, Pantik C, Duggirala S, Lindquist R. A Comparison Between Self-Reported and Investigator-Measured Cardiovascular Risk-Related Biometric Numbers. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2022;44(8):724 View
  5. Han H, Wang X, Zhu Y, Liang Y. Organized Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Attendance and Determinants in Rural China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(14):8237 View
  6. Lombardo J, Ko K, Shimada A, Nelson N, Wright C, Chen J, Maity A, Ruggiero M, Richard S, Papanagnou D, Mitchell E, Leader A, Simone N. Perceptions of and barriers to cancer screening by the sexual and gender minority community: a glimpse into the health care disparity. Cancer Causes & Control 2022;33(4):559 View
  7. Kasper G, Momen M, Sorice K, Mayhand K, Handorf E, Gonzalez E, Devlin A, Brownstein K, Esnaola N, Fisher S, Lynch S. Effect of neighborhood and individual-level socioeconomic factors on breast cancer screening adherence in a multi-ethnic study. BMC Public Health 2024;24(1) View
  8. Ilic I, Babic G, Dimitrijevic A, Sipetic Grujicic S, Ilic M. An Artificial Neural Network Prediction Model of Depressive Symptoms among Women with Abnormal Papanicolaou Smear Results before and after Diagnostic Procedures. Life 2024;14(9):1130 View
  9. Ilic I, Babic G, Dimitrijevic A, Sipetic Grujicic S, Jakovljevic V, Ilic M. Psychosocial Burden of Women Who Are to Undergo Additional Diagnostic Procedures Due to Positive Screening for Cervical Cancer. Cancers 2024;16(20):3541 View