The Fitbit One Physical Activity Tracker in Men With Prostate Cancer: Validation Study

Journals

1. Ballon-Landa E, Parsons J. Nutrition, physical activity, and lifestyle factors in prostate cancer prevention. Current Opinion in Urology 2018;28(1):55 View
2. Dreher N, Hadeler E, Hartman S, Wong E, Acerbi I, Rugo H, Majure M, Chien A, Esserman L, Melisko M. Fitbit Usage in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy. Clinical Breast Cancer 2019;19(6):443 View
3. Beach C, Billstrom G, Anderson Steeves E, Flynn J, Steeves J. The Physical Activity Patterns of Greenway Users Playing Pokémon Go: A Natural Experiment. Games for Health Journal 2019;8(1):7 View
4. DAVIS J, GRUBER A. Injured Runners Do Not Replace Lost Running Time with Other Physical Activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2020;52(5):1163 View
5. Feehan L, Geldman J, Sayre E, Park C, Ezzat A, Yoo J, Hamilton C, Li L. Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(8):e10527 View
6. Ummels D, Beekman E, Theunissen K, Braun S, Beurskens A. Counting Steps in Activities of Daily Living in People With a Chronic Disease Using Nine Commercially Available Fitness Trackers: Cross-Sectional Validity Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(4):e70 View
7. Modi P, Portney D, Hollenbeck B, Ellimoottil C. Engaging telehealth to drive value-based urology. Current Opinion in Urology 2018;28(4):342 View
8. Garg S, Williams N, Ip A, Dicker A. Clinical Integration of Digital Solutions in Health Care: An Overview of the Current Landscape of Digital Technologies in Cancer Care. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2018;(2):1 View
9. Massouh F, Martin R, Chan B, Ma J, Patel V, Geary M, Laffey J, Wijeysundera D, Abdallah F. Is Activity Tracker–Measured Ambulation an Accurate and Reliable Determinant of Postoperative Quality of Recovery? A Prospective Cohort Validation Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2019;129(4):1144 View
10. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin M, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor N. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18694 View
11. Breteler M, Janssen J, Spiering W, Kalkman C, van Solinge W, Dohmen D. Measuring Free-Living Physical Activity With Three Commercially Available Activity Monitors for Telemonitoring Purposes: Validation Study. JMIR Formative Research 2019;3(2):e11489 View
12. Auerswald T, Meyer J, von Holdt K, Voelcker-Rehage C. Application of Activity Trackers among Nursing Home Residents—A Pilot and Feasibility Study on Physical Activity Behavior, Usage Behavior, Acceptance, Usability and Motivational Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(18):6683 View
13. Low C. Harnessing consumer smartphone and wearable sensors for clinical cancer research. npj Digital Medicine 2020;3(1) View
14. Vogel R, Nagler R, Ahmed R, Brown K, Luo X, Martinson B, Lazovich D. UVR-sensor wearable device intervention to improve sun behaviors and reduce sunburns in melanoma survivors: study protocol of a parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21(1) View
15. Gorzelitz J, Farber C, Gangnon R, Cadmus-Bertram L. Accuracy of Wearable Trackers for Measuring Moderate- to Vigorous-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2020;3(4):346 View
16. Finlay A, Evans H, Vincent A, Wittert G, Vandelanotte C, Short C. Optimising Web-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Interventions for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of Website Architecture on User Engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(21):7920 View
17. Koontz B, Levine E, McSherry F, Niedzwiecki D, Sutton L, Dale T, Streicher M, Rushing C, Owen L, Kraus W, Bennett G, Pollak K. Increasing physical activity in Cancer Survivors through a Text-messaging Exercise motivation Program (ICanSTEP). Supportive Care in Cancer 2021;29(12):7339 View
18. Kingsnorth A, Patience M, Moltchanova E, Esliger D, Paine N, Hobbs M. Changes in Device-Measured Physical Activity Patterns in U.K. Adults Related to the First COVID-19 Lockdown. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2021;4(3):247 View
19. Matlary R, Holme P, Glosli H, Rueegg C, Grydeland M. Comparison of free‐living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X‐BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2022;28(6) View
20. Kudel I, Perry T. Communicating Treatment-Related Symptoms Using Passively Collected Data and Satisfaction/Loyalty Ratings: Exploratory Study. JMIR Cancer 2022;8(2):e29292 View
21. Giurgiu M, Timm I, Becker M, Schmidt S, Wunsch K, Nissen R, Davidovski D, Bussmann J, Nigg C, Reichert M, Ebner-Priemer U, Woll A, von Haaren-Mack B. Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(6):e36377 View
22. Qureshi S, Bookey-Bassett S, Purdy N, Greig M, Kelly H, Neumann W, Coelho D. Modelling the impacts of COVID-19 on nurse workload and quality of care using process simulation. PLOS ONE 2022;17(10):e0275890 View
23. Mehrabani G, Gross D, Aminian S, Manns P. Comparison of Fitbit One and ActivPAL3TM in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis in a Free-Living Environment. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour 2021;4(3):257 View
24. Khondakar K, Anwar M, Mazumdar H, Kaushik A. Perspective of point-of-care sensing systems in cancer management. Materials Advances 2023;4(21):4991 View
25. Brandenbarg P, Hoekstra F, Barakou I, Seves B, Hettinga F, Hoekstra T, van der Woude L, Dekker R, Krops L. Measurement properties of device-based physical activity instruments in ambulatory adults with physical disabilities and/or chronic diseases: a scoping review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;15(1) View