e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 2110 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 830 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 250 JMIR Formative Research
- 248 JMIR Research Protocols
- 188 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 116 JMIR Human Factors
- 92 JMIR Mental Health
- 52 JMIR Aging
- 52 JMIR Cancer
- 45 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 39 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 24 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 23 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 22 JMIR Cardio
- 21 JMIR Diabetes
- 19 JMIR Medical Education
- 17 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 12 JMIR Nursing
- 8 Iproceedings
- 8 JMIR Dermatology
- 6 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 5 JMIR Infodemiology
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Reference 7: Effectiveness of school-based eHealth interventions to prevent multiple lifestyle risk behaviours Reference 16: Who follows eHealth interventions as recommended? Reference 17: Tailored eHealth lifestyle promotion: which behavioral modules do users prefer?ehealth
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68754
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
While the ACE program is an onsite group intervention, previous research has shown that e Health can be used to provide audiological rehabilitation with positive results [15,16]. To facilitate the use and accessibility of the Swedish I-ACE program in audiological rehabilitation, the program was adapted for the online health portal for the public health care system, 1177.se.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71975
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 9: Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health InformationehealtheHealth Infrastructures
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63596
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mental Health Care Guidelines for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review
ehealthHealth Professionals' Training in eHealth, Digital Medicine, Medical Informatics Adoption and Change Management of eHealth Systems
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e56534
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Many individuals with COPD are older adults who may face difficulties using telehealth technologies, managing oxygen equipment, or accessing e Health resources [36]. Therefore, to enhance adherence outcomes, future telehealth-supported home oxygen interventions should be designed with greater sensitivity to patient characteristics, behavioral support needs, technological accessibility, and health care system contexts.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73010
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Finally, at the structural level, The TALK addresses systemic barriers to HIV prevention by offering culturally tailored, accessible e Health tools.
Through this multilevel approach, The TALK aims to strengthen resilience and support within Black male adolescents and young adults’ relationships and connection to the community to improve sexual health behavior and outcomes.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e67403
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We hypothesized that the hybrid treatment arms would be more effective than the e Health-only arm. Given the mixed findings of previous research, we could not predict whether the group or individual format would differ in overall effectiveness.
This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aiming to improve participants’ health behavior and thus, weight loss [31]. Participants were assigned to one of the 3 treatment arms: e Health, e Health+Group, or e Health+Individual.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e66518
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Various tools have been developed to evaluate the quality of m Health apps, such as the User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (u MARS) developed by Stoyanov et al [22], the Evaluation Tool for Mobile and Web-Based e Health Interventions (ENLIGHT) developed by Baumel et al [23], and the System Usability Scale (SUS) developed by Brooke [24].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e69637
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS