Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 13 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


A Web-Based Tool to Perform a Values Clarification for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Design and Preliminary Testing Study

A Web-Based Tool to Perform a Values Clarification for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Design and Preliminary Testing Study

The overall SURE test, saying “yes” to all 4 components, was 61.2% (156/255) for the standard group, 66.5% (145/218) for the visual group, and 67% (134/200) for the visual+VC group (visual vs standard, odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CI 0.86‐1.84; P=.23; visual+VC vs standard, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87‐1.90; P=.20).

Michael P Dorsch, Allen J Flynn, Kaitlyn M Greer, Sabah Ganai, Geoffrey D Barnes, Brian Zikmund-Fisher

JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e67956

Behavioral Factors Related to Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Adults With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

Behavioral Factors Related to Participation in Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Adults With Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study

With the 47.3% adult population with hypertension in the United States in 2021 [28], using 5% type 1 error (P=.05), the minimum sample size required to estimate participation in RBPM was 383 participants [29]. A minimum sample size of 500 has been recommended for the detection of differences between sample estimates and the population in observational studies involving logistic regression [30].

Chinwe E Eze, Michael P Dorsch, Antoinette B Coe, Corey A Lester, Lorraine R Buis, Karen B Farris

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e56954

Investigating Older Adults’ Perceptions of AI Tools for Medication Decisions: Vignette-Based Experimental Survey

Investigating Older Adults’ Perceptions of AI Tools for Medication Decisions: Vignette-Based Experimental Survey

We used a statistical significance level of P The survey was opened by 1318 individuals, of whom 73 participants were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria (eg, aged younger than 65 years) or demographic quotas being filled. The final sample for analysis included 1245 respondents (94% completion rate). Half (n=625, 50%) of the 1245 participants were female, and the median age was 70 (IQR 67-74 years; Table 2).

Sarah E Vordenberg, Julianna Nichols, Vincent D Marshall, Kristie Rebecca Weir, Michael P Dorsch

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e60794

Predictors of Smartphone and Tablet Use Among Patients With Hypertension: Secondary Analysis of Health Information National Trends Survey Data

Predictors of Smartphone and Tablet Use Among Patients With Hypertension: Secondary Analysis of Health Information National Trends Survey Data

For example, a pharmacist-led telemonitoring intervention involving weekly electronic transmission of home-measured BP and regulated telephone visits among 450 patients with uncontrolled BP resulted in a significant decrease in systolic BP at 6, 12, and 18 months of −10.7 mm Hg (95% CI −14.3 to −7.3 mm Hg), P Although we know the advantages of these technologies in achieving favorable health outcomes, little is known about the predictors of their use among patients with hypertension.

Chinwe E Eze, Brady T West, Michael P Dorsch, Antoinette B Coe, Corey A Lester, Lorraine R Buis, Karen Farris

J Med Internet Res 2022;24(1):e33188

The Effects of the ManageHF4Life Mobile App on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effects of the ManageHF4Life Mobile App on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

The participants were 60.2 (SD 9.2) years old in the app group and 62 (SD 9.2) years old in the no-app group (P=.38). The average EF was 37.2% in the app group and 38.2% in the no-app group (P=.73). Most of the participants were Caucasian: 81% (34/42) app vs 83% (34/41) no app (P=.56); most of the participants were also New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III: 55% (23/42) app vs 66% (27/41) no app (P=.41) at study enrollment.

Michael P Dorsch, Karen B Farris, Brigid E Rowell, Scott L Hummel, Todd M Koelling

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(12):e26185