Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
European COMPARative effectiveness research on blended depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED Reference 51: ['Morbus Google' vs e-health: a qualitative study of acceptance and implementation of online-aftercare Reference 52: Acceptance and barriers to access of occupational e-mental health: cross-sectional findingse-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology
J Med Internet Res 2019;21(10):e13655
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For a detailed description of the therapeutic rationale, see Beutel et al [28].
As primary outcomes, the medical referral rate was documented (frequency of recommendations of GSA-Online plus) and participants’ utilization of GSA-Online plus was tracked with PIWIK (now Matomo [29]), a secure open Web analytics platform and assessed with self-constructed single items (eg, “Please indicate how often you have used GSA-Online plus since the end of your inpatient treatment.”).
J Med Internet Res 2019;21(6):e12285
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Other findings are inconsistent, with various studies documenting a low uptake rate of e-mental health interventions by patients [21,25] or limited acceptance in the general population [26,27].
According to a recent representative population survey in Germany, less than 10% of the interviewed participants could imagine using psychological Web-based support and merely 2% had already used such services in the past [27].
J Med Internet Res 2016;18(12):e337
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS