Search Results (1 to 4 of 4 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Q31 was designed as a 3-scale question (yes–neutral–no). Q32, Q34, and Q36 were designed as polar questions (yes or no questions) with branching logic. These questions followed a free-text question, and it was only displayed if the previous question regarding m Health was answered with “no” and personal concerns and problems were inquired. If necessary, we explained technical terms in a footnote.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(1):e19727
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As an empirical usability evaluation method, we used a questionnaire. The survey was conducted for three months at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Participation was voluntary and pseudonymized. Inclusion criteria for participation were: age older than 18 years, German-speaking, and being physically and mentally able to fill out a structured questionnaire on a mobile device.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(2):e45
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mobile Health in Oncology: A Patient Survey About App-Assisted Cancer Care
A work by Collado-Borrell et al [8] pointed out a lack of professional involvement during development and validation of 166 apps for cancer patients. Only 48.8% were developed by health care organizations.
Recently, a randomized clinical trial by Denis et al [9] investigated the outcome of lung cancer patients and showed a significantly better survival for patients (median overall survival 19 vs 12 months) using a Web-based tool for periodical documentation of symptoms and side effects during follow-up.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5(6):e81
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Practicing m Health as a patient-assisting approach only is not expedient. Rather, m Health with professionally advised telemedical services as a holistic concept of diagnostics and treatment is the objective of further development.
Recently, Denis et al [10] showed a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with high-risk lung cancer using a mobile-friendly Web app.
J Med Internet Res 2016;18(11):e312
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS