Search Articles

View query in Help articles search
e.g. John Smith or 0000-0001-6479-5330

Search Results (1 to 2 of 2 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study

An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study

Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients (n=106). a Level of education: 1=lowest; 5=highest. Education level and therapy setting of the patients (n=106). a High school diploma indicates “Abitur.” Table 3 presents the results of the Wilcoxon test for analyzing parallel forms reliability in the single items of FACT-B. The e PRO tool seems to demonstrate acceptable parallel forms reliability as only 2 significant differences (out of 37 in total) could be found in the single-item comparison.

Lina Maria Matthies, Florin-Andrei Taran, Lucia Keilmann, Andreas Schneeweiss, Elisabeth Simoes, Andreas D Hartkopf, Alexander N Sokolov, Christina B Walter, Nina Sickenberger, Stephanie Wallwiener, Manuel Feisst, Paul Gass, Michael P Lux, Florian Schuetz, Peter A Fasching, Christof Sohn, Sara Y Brucker, Joachim Graf, Markus Wallwiener

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(1):e10004

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 1

Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial

Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial

Originally, n=153 patients were assessed for eligibility, of which 47 were excluded during recruiting, allocation, and data analyses as shown in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram (Figure 4). A total of 53 patients were assigned tablet computer, followed by paper in the same session (arm A), whereas the same number of patients filled out the paper-based version, followed by the tablet-based questionnaire (arm B).

Markus Wallwiener, Lina Matthies, Elisabeth Simoes, Lucia Keilmann, Andreas D Hartkopf, Alexander N Sokolov, Christina B Walter, Nina Sickenberger, Stephanie Wallwiener, Manuel Feisst, Paul Gass, Peter A Fasching, Michael P Lux, Diethelm Wallwiener, Florin-Andrei Taran, Joachim Rom, Andreas Schneeweiss, Joachim Graf, Sara Y Brucker

J Med Internet Res 2017;19(9):e322

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML
Article has an altmetric score of 7