Search Results (1 to 10 of 1915 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 549 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 345 JMIR Research Protocols
- 207 JMIR Formative Research
- 156 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 86 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 84 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 71 JMIR Mental Health
- 45 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 42 JMIR Human Factors
- 36 JMIR Cancer
- 34 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 27 JMIR Medical Education
- 25 JMIR Aging
- 24 JMIR Dermatology
- 23 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 22 JMIR Diabetes
- 20 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 19 Iproceedings
- 17 JMIR Serious Games
- 13 JMIR Infodemiology
- 11 JMIR Cardio
- 11 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 11 JMIRx Med
- 11 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 9 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Nursing
- 5 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis
We had sufficient studies to analyze whether mindfulness was higher during neurofeedback than during control conditions (k=4, g=0.14) and whether the brain target was modulated more during neurofeedback than during control (k=5, g=0.12; Table 5 and Figure S5 in Multimedia Appendix 1). Neither effect was significant (P>.15). There was no indication of reporting bias.
Omnibus effect sizes for within-participant inductions by process domains.
a I2 (tau): heterogeneity measures.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68204
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Making Medical Education Courses Visible: Theory-Based Development of a National Database
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e62838
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
We evaluated several recommender methods for accurate prediction, including K-nearest neighbors, probabilistic matrix factorization, collective matrix factorization, and the Bayesian probabilistic matrix factorization (BPMF) [33]. In evaluating rating prediction methods, we used a range of standard performance metrics including root mean squared error, Kendall tau-b, and normalized discounted cumulative gain. In all these tests, BPMF was identified as the best single model.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63693
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section