Search Results (1 to 10 of 460 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 136 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 84 JMIR Research Protocols
- 52 JMIR Formative Research
- 45 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 27 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 13 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 12 JMIR Human Factors
- 11 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 10 JMIR Medical Education
- 8 JMIR Aging
- 8 JMIR Cancer
- 8 JMIR Mental Health
- 7 Iproceedings
- 7 JMIR Serious Games
- 6 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 5 JMIR Diabetes
- 4 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 4 JMIRx Med
- 3 JMIR Cardio
- 3 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 2 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Answer choices included: 0 (“I do not think of suicide or death”), 1 (“I feel that life is empty or wonder if it’s worth living”), 2 (“I think of suicide or death several times a week for several minutes”), and 3 (“I think of suicide or death several times a day in some detail, or I have made specific plans for suicide or have actually tried to take my life”).
An item from the CGI-BDD was used to determine whether participants perceived their past-week BDD symptoms improving or worsening.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e63605
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
For usability testing, participants completed the 30-item USE questionnaire [65] which contains 4 subscales assessing usefulness (eg, “It helps me be more effective”), ease of use (eg, “It is easy to use”), ease of learning (eg, “I learned to use it quickly”), and satisfaction (eg, “I am satisfied with it”) on an 8-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 8=strongly agree).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65188
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Sample items include “I think that I would like to use bhoos frequently” and “I thought bhoos was easy to use.” Responses to each item range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Possible scores on the SUS range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating higher overall usability of a system or program. The SUS has been used in roughly 3500 surveys within 273 studies evaluating a range of systems, interfaces, and programs [37]. Internal consistency of the SUS was good (α=0.84).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69873
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Although applying physical changes such as standing desks may be a solution to break up sitting time at work, it appears to be a less feasible strategy in the home office context due to the expensive cost for the companies:
I’m a big advocate of standing desks, standing workstations in terms of being effective but I appreciate that in this situation it’s probably not feasible for them to be incorporated in the home-office.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e59405
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Extended Reality (XR) in Pediatric Acute and Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map
patient and clinician voices in developing tools to address pain related school impairment: a phase I
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e63854
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS