Search Results (1 to 10 of 2163 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 593 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 390 JMIR Research Protocols
- 211 JMIR Formative Research
- 189 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 123 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 105 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 77 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 66 JMIR Dermatology
- 65 JMIR Mental Health
- 55 JMIR Human Factors
- 32 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 28 JMIR Aging
- 27 JMIR Medical Education
- 26 JMIR Serious Games
- 23 JMIR Cancer
- 21 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 20 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 18 JMIR Diabetes
- 16 Iproceedings
- 16 JMIR Cardio
- 15 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 9 JMIR AI
- 9 JMIRx Med
- 7 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 6 JMIR Infodemiology
- 3 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Data
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The Fisher exact test yielded P=.01, indicating a statistically significant difference.
As shown in Table 2, the average word count of the original notes was 320 words, and the average length reduction of the H-summaries and U-summaries was 22% (SD 15%) and 23% (SD 15%) words, respectively. A negative number for length reduction in Table 2 indicates that the summary generated had more words than the original text.
In our analysis, we identified 3 instances of false information in U-summaries.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e66476
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Mean EMAs completed in the incentivized arm was 13.3 (SD 11.2, range 0‐40, average completion rate of 31.7% out of 42 total EMA prompts) and 4.7 (SD 5.8, range 0‐28, average completion rate of 11.2% out of 42 total EMA prompts) in the nonincentivized arm (P
Smoking cessation outcomes overall and by group.
a EMA: ecological momentary assessment.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67630
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

We used established methods to calculate the standard error and 95% CI for the OR [23], as well as the P value for significance [24]. The unadjusted OR for antibiotic prescribing and antiviral prescribing was calculated separately.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e72322
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The R2 of the regression model is 0.52 (P
We next investigated possible mechanisms to explain the relationship between unaided and aided SRS. We used a hypothesis-driven approach with forward selection of variables in linear regression models for change in score, optimizing Akaike Information Criterion with each iteration [37].
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e66013
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Nominal P values were reported.
ICCs were used to compare night-level metrics between each DHT and human raters.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e72216
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

P values, means, SEs, and sample sizes were calculated for each comparison. If a comparison between months given pre-post data was significant (P
For Q4, contingency tables were constructed to examine potential relationships between students’ likelihood of entering the health care field and each listed barrier. Contingency tables allow for the evaluation of interrelationships between categorical variables. A χ2 test was then applied to determine statistical significance.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70505
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

A Bonferroni correction was applied to all P values by multiplying each P value by 4, the number of tests conducted, to correct for multiple comparisons; a P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant after correction.
Timelines of OARS use were also described for MOUD providers and case managers. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All qualitative data were analyzed using a coding reliability thematic analysis approach [16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69953
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68681
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS