This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Innovations and Technology in Cancer Care (423) Research Instruments, Questionnaires, and Tools (576) New Methods (944) Design, Usability, and Evaluation of Research Instruments, Scales, and Measures (52) User Needs and Competencies (303) Methods in Cancer Research (29)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Jul-Dec

Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Authors of this article:

Andreas D Hartkopf1 Author Orcid Image ;   Joachim Graf2 Author Orcid Image ;   Elisabeth Simoes2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lucia Keilmann3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Sickenberger3 Author Orcid Image ;   Paul Gass4 Author Orcid Image ;   Diethelm Wallwiener1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lina Matthies3 Author Orcid Image ;   Florin-Andrei Taran1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael P Lux4 Author Orcid Image ;   Stephanie Wallwiener3 Author Orcid Image ;   Eric Belleville5 Author Orcid Image ;   Christof Sohn3 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter A Fasching4 Author Orcid Image ;   Andreas Schneeweiss3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sara Y Brucker2 Author Orcid Image ;   Markus Wallwiener3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (30) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Matthies L, Taran F, Keilmann L, Schneeweiss A, Simoes E, Hartkopf A, Sokolov A, Walter C, Sickenberger N, Wallwiener S, Feisst M, Gass P, Lux M, Schuetz F, Fasching P, Sohn C, Brucker S, Graf J, Wallwiener M. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for the FACT-B (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast) Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Reliability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(1):e10004 View
  2. Karsten M, Speiser D, Hartmann C, Zeuschner N, Lippold K, Kiver V, Gocke P, Kirchberger V, Blohmer J. Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement Dataset in a Major German University Hospital: Observational Study. JMIR Cancer 2018;4(2):e11373 View
  3. Oppenheimer J, Leviton A, Chiujdea M, Antonetty A, Ojo O, Garcia S, Weas S, Fleegler E, Chan E, Loddenkemper T. Caring electronically for young outpatients who have epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior 2018;87:226 View
  4. Meirte J, Hellemans N, Anthonissen M, Denteneer L, Maertens K, Moortgat P, Van Daele U. Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review. JMIR Perioperative Medicine 2020;3(1):e15588 View
  5. Leviton A, Dammann O, Allred E, Joseph R, Fichorova R, O'Shea T, Kuban K. Neonatal systemic inflammation and the risk of low scores on measures of reading and mathematics achievement at age 10 years among children born extremely preterm. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 2018;66(1):45 View
  6. Wallwiener M, Matthies L, Simoes E, Keilmann L, Hartkopf A, Sokolov A, Walter C, Sickenberger N, Wallwiener S, Feisst M, Gass P, Fasching P, Lux M, Wallwiener D, Taran F, Rom J, Schneeweiss A, Graf J, Brucker S. Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(9):e322 View
  7. Bennett K, Ranganathan K, Patterson A, Baker M, Vercler C, Kasten S, Buchman S, Waljee J. Caregiver-Reported Outcomes and Barriers to Care among Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2018;142(6):884e View
  8. Leviton A, Oppenheimer J, Chiujdea M, Antonetty A, Ojo O, Garcia S, Weas S, Fleegler E, Chan E, Loddenkemper T. Characteristics of Future Models of Integrated Outpatient Care. Healthcare 2019;7(2):65 View
  9. Asensio-Cuesta S, Sánchez-García Á, Conejero J, Saez C, Rivero-Rodriguez A, García-Gómez J. Smartphone Sensors for Monitoring Cancer-Related Quality of Life: App Design, EORTC QLQ-C30 Mapping and Feasibility Study in Healthy Subjects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16(3):461 View
  10. Ma J, Zou Z, Pazo E, Moutari S, Liu Y, Jin F. Comparative Analysis of Paper-Based and Web-Based Versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) Questionnaire in Breast Cancer Patients: Randomized Crossover Study. JMIR Medical Informatics 2021;9(3):e18269 View
  11. Lee M, Kang D, Kim S, Lim J, Yoon J, Kim Y, Shim S, Kang E, Ahn J, Cho J, Shin S, Oh D. Who is more likely to adopt and comply with the electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) mobile application? A real-world study with cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(1):659 View
  12. Graf J, Sickenberger N, Brusniak K, Matthies L, Deutsch T, Simoes E, Plappert C, Keilmann L, Hartkopf A, Walter C, Hahn M, Engler T, Wallwiener S, Schuetz F, Fasching P, Schneeweiss A, Brucker S, Wallwiener M. Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome App for Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: Evaluation and Acceptability Analysis in a Two-Center Prospective Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(2):e16128 View
  13. Overkamp F. Apps and More: Potentials of Digitalization in Breast Medicine. Breast Care 2019;14(3):136 View
  14. Hevroni G, Korde N. Examining health related quality of life outcomes in multiple myeloma: Past and future perspectives. Seminars in Oncology 2022;49(1):94 View
  15. Meirte J, Tyack Z. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Burn Scar Rehabilitation: A Guide to Implementation and Evaluation. European Burn Journal 2022;3(2):290 View
  16. Chen S, Keglovits M, Devine M, Stark S. Sociodemographic Differences in Respondent Preferences for Survey Formats: Sampling Bias and Potential Threats to External Validity. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation 2022;4(1):100175 View
  17. Brugnaro B, Vieira F, Fernandes G, de Camargo O, Fumincelli L, de Campos A, Pavão S, Rocha N. Exploration of the Feasibility of Remote Assessment of Functioning in Children and Adolescents with Developmental Disabilities: Parents’ Perspectives and Related Contextual Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(22):15101 View
  18. TÜRKMEN C, KILINÇ H. The reliability of patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain when answered in online, telephone, and face-to-face interview format. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 2022;6(1):148 View
  19. Generalova O, Roy M, Hall E, Shah S, Cunanan K, Fardeen T, Velazquez B, Chu G, Bruzzone B, Cabot A, Fisher G, Srinivas S, Fan A, Haraldsdottir S, Wakelee H, Neal J, Padda S, Johnson T, Heestand G, Hsieh R, Ramchandran K. Implementation of a cloud-based electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) platform in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2021;5(1) View
  20. Parker D, Werth P, Christensen D, Jevsevar D. Differential item functioning to validate setting of delivery compatibility in PROMIS-global health. Quality of Life Research 2022;31(7):2189 View
  21. de Ligt K, de Rooij B, Koppert L, van de Poll-Franse L, Velikova G, Cardoso F. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Improve the Care Continuum for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Opportunities and Implications for Nursing Practice. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 2023;39(6):151510 View
  22. Cho Y, Lavoie Smith E, Zahrieh D, Chow S, Williams D, Saint Arnault D, Jiang Y. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection Systems in Oncology Clinical Trials: A Survey of Clinical Research Professionals (an Alliance Study). JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2023;(7) View
  23. de Ligt K, Koppert L, de Rooij B, van de Poll-Franse L, Velikova G, Cardoso F. Seizing the moment: The time for harnessing electronic patient-reported outcome measures for enhanced and sustainable metastatic breast cancer care is now. The Breast 2024;74:103676 View
  24. Smith E, Cho Y, Hillman S, Scott M, Harlos E, Wills R, Loprinzi C, Wilson C, Zahrieh D. Patient-targeted education (ePRO-E) to increase ePRO intent within an Alliance clinical trial (A221805-SI1). JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2024;8(1) View
  25. Shipman L, Price J, Abdulwahid D, Bayman N, Blackhall F, Califano R, Chan C, Coote J, Eaton M, Fenemore J, Gomes F, Harris M, Halkyard E, Lindsay C, Neal H, McEntee D, Sheikh H, Summers Y, Taylor P, Woolf D, Yorke J, Faivre-Finn C. Service Evaluation of MyChristie-MyHealth, an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Integrated Into Clinical Cancer Care. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2024;(8) View
  26. Gebert P, Hage A, Blohmer J, Roehle R, Karsten M. Longitudinal assessment of real-world patient adherence: a 12-month electronic patient-reported outcomes follow-up of women with early breast cancer undergoing treatment. Supportive Care in Cancer 2024;32(6) View
  27. Salmani H, Nasiri S, Ahmadi M. The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  28. Salmani H, Nasiri S, Alemrajabi M, Ahmadi M. Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2024;5 View
  29. Lyu J, Zhang H, Wang H, Liu X, Jing Y, Yin L, Wang A. Facilitators and barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: a systematic review based on the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implementation Science Communications 2024;5(1) View
  30. Boutib A, Azizi A, Youlyouz-Marfak I, Kouiti M, Taiebine M, Benfatah M, Nejjari C, Bounou S, Marfak A. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROs) as tools for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with gynecologic and breast cancers: a systematic review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View