TY - JOUR AU - Lo, Jonathon AU - Ballurkar, Kieran AU - Fox, Simonie AU - Tynan, Kate AU - Luu, Nghiep AU - Boyer, Michael AU - Murali-Ganesh, Raghav PY - 2021 DA - 2021/11/23 TI - A Digital Coaching Intervention for Cancer Survivors With Job Loss: Retrospective Study JO - JMIR Cancer SP - e31966 VL - 7 IS - 4 KW - cancer survivors KW - employment KW - absenteeism KW - mobile app KW - software KW - return to work AB - Background: Returning to work is a key unmet need for working-age cancer survivors. Objective: This study sought to evaluate return-to-work outcomes of a multidisciplinary intervention provided as routine employee support. Methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, patients with cancer and more than 3 months of absence from work were provided with an intervention consisting of digital resources and calls with a health coach. Propensity score matching was used to define a similar cohort of cancer patients absent from work, who were not offered the coaching intervention. The return-to-work rate as a percentage of all participants and secondary outcomes, such as the rate of death, were measured. The median time to return to work was compared between the cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 220 participants were enrolled in the intervention, of which 125 met the criteria for analysis. The median follow-up from cancer diagnosis was 79 weeks (IQR 60-106 weeks). In the matched control group, 22 (17.6%) participants returned to work compared with 38 (30.4%) in the intervention group (P=.02). Additionally, 19 (15.2%) matched controls died prior to claim closure compared with 13 (10.4%) in the intervention group (P=.26). The Kaplan-Meier estimated median time for the first 15% of the cohort to return to work was 87.1 weeks (95% CI 60.0-109.1 weeks) for the matched control group compared with 70.6 weeks (95% CI 52.6-79.6 weeks; P=.08) for the intervention group. Conclusions: Patients receiving a remotely delivered coaching program in a real-world setting returned to work at a higher frequency than did control participants receiving usual care. SN - 2369-1999 UR - https://cancer.jmir.org/2021/4/e31966 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/31966 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34710853 DO - 10.2196/31966 ID - info:doi/10.2196/31966 ER -