@Article{info:doi/10.2196/57834,
author="Hou, Sharon H J
and Henry, Brianna
and Drummond, Rachelle
and Forbes, Caitlin
and Mendon{\c{c}}a, Kyle
and Wright, Holly
and Rahamatullah, Iqra
and Tutelman, Perri R
and Zwicker, Hailey
and Stokoe, Mehak
and Duong, Jenny
and Drake, Emily K
and Erker, Craig
and Taccone, Michael S
and Sutherland, Liam
and Nathan, Paul
and Spavor, Maria
and Goddard, Karen
and Reynolds, Kathleen
and Schulte, Fiona S M",
title="Co-Designing Priority Components of an mHealth Intervention to Enhance Follow-Up Care in Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer and Health Care Providers: Qualitative Descriptive Study",
journal="JMIR Cancer",
year="2025",
month="Apr",
day="25",
volume="11",
pages="e57834",
keywords="mobile health; mHealth; pediatric oncology; cancer survivorship; qualitative research; patient-oriented research; co-design; intervention development",
abstract="Background: Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of medical, psychological, and social late effects. To screen for their risks, receipt of consistent, cancer-specific follow-up care is crucial. However, <50{\%} of survivors attend their aftercare, and only 35{\%} of them recognize that they could have a serious health problem. The use of mobile health (mHealth) is a promising form of intervention to educate, connect, and empower survivors of childhood cancer on the importance of follow-up care. Objective: This study aimed to use co-design to identify the priority components to include in an mHealth intervention with young adult (aged between 18 and 39 years) survivors of childhood cancer and health care providers. Methods: This study was conducted between January and November 2022 in Canada and used patient-oriented research methods. Participants were recruited through local or provincial long-term follow-up clinics, using convenience sampling from patient partners who assisted in recruiting survivors across geographical areas in western, central, and eastern Canada, and social media outreach (X, formally known as Twitter; Facebook; and Instagram). Qualitative descriptive data (focus group interviews) from survivors of childhood cancer and health care providers (individual interviews) were gathered. We analyzed the collected data using reflexive thematic analysis and verified it through member checking techniques through an online community engagement event. Results: We conducted with patient partners 5 online (Zoom) focus groups with 22 survivors of childhood cancer (mean age 29.19, SD 4.78 y). We conducted individual telephone interviews with 7 health care providers. Participants identified five priority areas to be included in an mHealth intervention: (1) connections, (2) education and information, (3) engagement, (4) personalization, and (5) resources. Results were shared with and validated by survivors of childhood cancer, their families, health care providers, and academic researchers as part of a community engagement event. Small and large group discussions were facilitated to allow participants to review and discuss the accuracy of the themes derived regarding the core components to be included in mHealth. A graphic recording artist visually captured key ideas from the event. A subset of the participants also completed a web-based satisfaction survey, and responses indicated that the community engagement event was generally well received. Conclusions: Results from this study have provided the necessary foundation to progress in intervention development. The next step of this multiphased project is to build an innovative and accessible mHealth intervention prototype that is based on the identified core components and is grounded in an established conceptual framework for co-design of mHealth. ",
issn="2369-1999",
doi="10.2196/57834",
url="https://cancer.jmir.org/2025/1/e57834",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/57834"
}